User talk:Trscavo

SAML

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. Just thought I'd leave a message to say I'm very impressed with the way you've transformed the SAML article. A brilliant first contribution. CheekyMonkey 23:49, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

UML diagrams

May I ask what drawing/diagramming tool you are using to produce your sequence diagrams? Allenc28 21:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I used the drawing tool in MS Word. Trscavo 13:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Saml-anatomy.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Saml-anatomy.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — jmorgan (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Saml-anatomy.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Saml-anatomy.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Just a small thing: when I choose to print and the "shrink to fit" option is on in IE11, the font used by the printer is too small to read, at least much smaller than most of the articles in Wikipedia. The cause could be the schema on the web browser SSO, which is too large and requires IE11 to zoom out when printing, thus makes the font so small. Do you think we can resize that drawing so it fits into a letter or A4 page, when we choose 100% in the print menu of IE11? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.254.147.140 (talk) 06:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use File:Saml2-browser-sso-redirect-post.png

Hi,

I'm working on a book on Hadoop Security that includes some discussion of SAML. I was hoping I could use a copy of your Web Browser SSO image in my description of the protocol. If you'd be willing to provide the image under a non-share-alike license, I can include it in my book. Feel free to e-mail me (book at hadoop-security.com).

-Joey Fwiffo (talk) 18:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SAML cross reference

Hi - I noticed that you changed the Wiki-link that I added for assertion on the SAML article. [[1]] My intention is to send readers to the general definition of assertion, but your link sends them only to the specific type of assertion related to SAML, which doesn't really help as much. I always hate getting reverted so I thought I'd reach out to you here and see if you agree. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 23:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @TimTempleton. Thanks for taking the time to write. I'm afraid the definition of Assertion_(software_development) does not apply in this case. It refers to something else entirely and so it doesn't really help (or so I claim).

I would be open to writing a new article entitled "Assertion (SAML)" but that is more difficult than it sounds since there are multiple versions of SAML. That is why there are separate articles for SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0.

Btw, you may have noticed that I added articles for identity provider (SAML) and service provider (SAML). These terms are thrown about freely in the SAML-related articles so I felt SAML-specific definitions were needed. However, I'm not sure if the same reasoning applies to "Assertion (SAML)". Tom Scavo (talk) 14:50, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely correct - my bad. I took the opportunity to educate myself a bit and made two changes. I clarified the text in the Security Assertion Markup Language lede rather than Wiki-linking to the subsection, as you had done, and added a disambiguation hatnote to the top of the Assertion (software development) article. What do you think? Better? TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 20:21, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very nicely done, @TimTempleton :-) Tom Scavo (talk) 22:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Trscavo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Heracleum maximum (common cowparsnip) seeds.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Heracleum maximum (common cowparsnip) seeds.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Heracleum mantegazzianum (giant hogweed) seeds.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Heracleum mantegazzianum (giant hogweed) seeds.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:01, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Cow parsnip (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Cow parsnip (disambiguation), Trscavo!

Wikipedia editor Bennv3771 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please do read MOS:DAB for future reference.

To reply, leave a comment on Bennv3771's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Bennv3771 (talk) 15:43, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Bergapten (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Heracleum

Methoxsalen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Heracleum

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Hickory Tussock Moth 2018 Sep 16 (1).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hickory Tussock Moth 2018 Sep 16 (1).jpg, which you've attributed to CC BY-NC. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 02:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Trscavo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cryptographic authenticator moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cryptographic authenticator, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Authenticator (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Authenticator instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There's already an Authenticator article and it's about computer authentication

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Authenticator and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Authenticator, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:45, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit of Trillium luteum

Hi, I’m really curious why you think it’s necessary to have three lines of text for a web citation, when a single click provides all the details required? If every citation had this amount of detail, people might struggle to find the actual links, and the refs would be three times the length of the article itself (p.s. the original link was wrong anyway). Yours in puzzlement, Darorcilmir (talk) 16:36, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I use Template:EFloras for consistency. The actual content is determined by the template and therefore mostly out of my control. Tom Scavo (talk) 17:03, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see the template is “underused”. Hardly surprising. It’s counter-productive to have such an unwieldy chunk of text for such a simple weblink. Darorcilmir (talk) 19:52, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't disagree with your assessment but the use of a template trumps all else IMO. A single mod to the underlying code changes everything, everywhere. Tom Scavo (talk) 22:39, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trillium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 03:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Trillium

Hi Hardyplants. I'm looking at your photo in article Trillium cernuum. Since the shot is so far away, I'm having trouble confirming the identity of the plants in the photo. AFAICT, there are no pigments in the reproductive organs, which leads me to speculate that this might be T. flexipes, not T. cernuum. Can you tell me where in MN this photo was taken? If you have any other info that would help positively identify these plants, I'd be grateful. Tom Scavo (talk) 15:37, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Pigments in the floral structures are not a reliable way to ID these species. The picture was taken just south of the Twin Cities, where both species are native. Unfortunately, the flowers in the picture are washed out by the flash and there is a loss of details. I have both species. There is a lot of variation in specimens but generally T. cernuum has the flower hidden below the foliage, and T. flexipes has the flower level with or above the "leaves", Within our local populations the length of the peduncle is also different with T. flexipes having a very long one while T. cernuum has one just long enough to get the flower under the leavesHardyplants (talk) 05:37, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Camel's Hump, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Ellen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:49, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Trscavo, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 02:21, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eriocapitella hupehensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cyme.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trillium cernuum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filament.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trillium erectum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benzoin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Saml-use-case.gif

The file File:Saml-use-case.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:Saml-use-case.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:41, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Persistence (botany), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calyx.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: American ginseng

Hello Trscavo! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as American ginseng, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02859148, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:American ginseng and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, American ginseng, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:American ginseng. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:American ginseng with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:American ginseng saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 02:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Lamium galeobdolon. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 04:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the WikiProject Plants Stub-to-Start Drive

Hello Trscavo! I would like to invite you to join the WikiProject Plants Stub-to-Start Drive where we focus efforts on upgrading Stub-class plant species articles to Start-class. The instructions are straightforward and located on the page for the drive. If you wish to participate, you can join on the sign-up page, or feel free to ask for assistance on the talk page any time. Thank you for your contributions and for your interest in plant articles on Wikipedia! Fritzmann (message me) 13:36, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trillium vaseyi

Are you quite sure that this was named after the younger Vasey (George Richard) rather than his father (Dr. George)? The protolog refers to "Dr. George Vasey", not "G. R. Vasey" as Aaron & Wes state, and "California Plant Names" does not support the assertion that George Richard collected extensively in North Carolina. Choess (talk) 23:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I'm still working on this but at this point I agree with Floden & Knapp (2023). I will track down the lectotype and let you know what I find out. In the meantime, check out the description of Rhododendron vaseyi A.Gray. This is strong evidence that the younger Vasey was collecting in NC in 1878.

If Harbison's original material was at the Biltmore Herbarium, it may have been destroyed in 1916. The presumptive isotypes (PH, GH, F, NY) all have "G. R. Vasey" labels. Maybe after 22 years, with the elder George deceased and the younger George off farming in Washington or whatever, Harbison reflexively assumed the better-known Vasey was the collector. Thanks for setting me straight! Choess (talk) 00:44, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]