This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Much of the article has been focused on stating things that the subject has claimed or believed, to the degree that it seems to be being built to make her argument, which is not the goal of Wikipedia. I've been trimming out particularly those sourced to Radack's court filings. Court filings are not reliable independent secondary sources; they are primary sources for the claims being made, but even then we would rely on an independent secondary source to show us which claims are being made of interest (correction made November 28, 2024). They aren't even particularly good statements for what Radack believes, as a court document is not intended to be a full statement of belief but rather than argument being made to pursue an interest in a case. Others should keep an eye on peeling this back. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 15:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JusticeDelayedButNotDenied: You have inserted IMDb as a source. As you can see at WP:IMDb, that site has been repeatedly judged not to be a reliable source for our purposes. I have again undone the addition.
I will also note that the introduction to the article is intended to be a summary of the article below; the material on Silenced is not below, but should be moved there. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 14:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
