Talk:Jamba!

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Untitled

"When scrolling over the ad, it plays ringtones that most users find annoying." kan je vaandag jamba star 2007 2004 voor mgn zeten Subjective nonsense? I'm inclined to agree, but this "fact" neither verifiable nor particularly encyclopedic content. I'm taking it out.

crazy frog

Shouldn't this be "Jamster?" WhisperToMe 02:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jamster is just a trademark of Jamba --AiR 21:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How come nobody mentions the fact that Jamba star 2007 2004 is a scam-company, and has been disallowed in amongst other countries, Australia? Is this page directly edited by Jambas CEO?

cite? I live in the US now, but as of December `06, Jamster is alive and well in Australia. Achromatic 20:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Profit or turnover?

"Jamba/Jamster boomed - when VeriSign bought the business it was making $15 million per quarter and 3 quarters later it was making $150 million a quarter - in 2005 the company made close to $600 million in revenue."

On first reading of this I thought they were making $15 million profit a quarter, then $150 million - but as about half of it was sold for $188 million it must be turnover, otherwise the price would be far higher. The meaning of the word "revenue" is not well known to non-accountants in this country - people could easily think it meant profit. Plus if someone used the phrase "they were making" I would have thought they were referring to profit rather than turnover or revenue. 80.3.41.218 15:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo jamba navi.gif

Image:Logo jamba navi.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 15:06, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History

In the 2nd paragraph of the history section, it starts talking about VeriSign without any indication of how it relates to Jamba!. This really needs to be tidied up somehow by whoever wrote this section. --95.112.170.228 (talk) 11:08, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

past tense

The entire article is written in the present tense as if this whole thing didn't take place over 10 years ago, wouldn't it be better to change it to the past tense? Mijzelffan (talk) 23:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jamba!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jamba!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061230224204/http://yahoo.businessweek.com/technology/content/jul2005/tc20050725_1047_tc024.htm to http://yahoo.businessweek.com/technology/content/jul2005/tc20050725_1047_tc024.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Logo

The new Logo is without >>!<<, can someone change the Title/lemma? --84.152.8.52 (talk) 22:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC) :::@84.152.8.52: I also see that both of the pictures are described as "the new logo", even though they are different. - user:Year1888 - 09:34 11 March 2019 (GMT+1)[reply]

Link to German page

Hello, I'm not quite sure how its done, but I'm very positive that the German page to the company should be linked, as its quite weird, that a German brand doesn't have a page/is linked to a German page. And I'd guess this would be appropriate: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesta_Digital — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sydebrix (talk • contribs) 22:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]