Talk:Mulatto
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mulatto article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 October 2019. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
False claim
[edit]User @MonsenorNouel is including the false claim that "Brazil has the largest mulatto population in the world". None of the "sources" state the claim. He is doing WP:SYNTH and WP:OR and therefore the claim must be removed. Torimem (talk) 13:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Now removed. I agree that there are obvious OR/SYNTH concerns to be overcome here. I have no particular reason to doubt that Brazil has the largest mulatto population in the world, but we need a source saying so explicitly. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Humanities 2 F24
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Halliwas (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Purplexcloudz (talk) 16:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 20 December 2024
[edit]It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Mulatto. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
In the passage "Mulattoes in colonial Mexico" there is the following sentence:
"Some said categorized persons i.e. mulata blanca used their light skin to their advantage if they escaped their unlawful and brutal incarceration from their criminal slave owners, thus 'passing' as free persons of color."
I suggest it be changed to the following:
"Some said categorized persons i.e. mulata blanca used their light skin to their advantage if they escaped slavery."
Slavery was legal in Mexico at the time and the passage about 'passing' in reference to their light skin is redundant.
Additionally, the rest of the passage seems to show that ideas about 'passing' are anachronistic, with a below passage stating; "There was considerable malleability and manipulation of racial labeling, including the seemingly stable category of mulatto." The passage continues on to give an example to demonstrate that racial categorization doesn't depend upon heritage but upon social perception, I propose that passing implies bypassing a system of exclusivity by being perceived as something you are not, and that in this case because racial understanding seems to be more rooted in that perception than of heritage, therefore the concept of 'passing' doesn't make sense. Opydoopy (talk) 08:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class African diaspora articles
- Mid-importance African diaspora articles
- WikiProject African diaspora articles
- C-Class Ethnic groups articles
- Mid-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- C-Class Discrimination articles
- Low-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests