User talk:Raylopez99

(William M. Connolley 19:31, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)) I *think* that User:Raylopez99 is a page that just happens to be called User:something rather than a proper user page. RL, if you're reading this, you need to create an account properly.

Welcome

Hello Raylopez99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Naming conventions

Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Thank you for signing up!

Arktos ^talk 23:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Raylopez99 17:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tired of Global Warming bias and cabal mentality? Help collect the evidence

Please feel free to add examples of bias you have encountered by the pro-Global Warming crowd at my page...I am accumulating all of the evidence for various actions throughout Wikipedia for the pages, users, etc and your help with the footwork is appreciated. -- Tony of Race to the Right 15:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Raylopez99 is the Subject/headline here

Raylopez99 is the Subject/headline here (repeated)

Raylopez99 19:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

Hi. Don't spam us; we have enough traffic alredy William M. Connolley (talk) 16:17, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Global warming are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Kim D. Petersen (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above could just as well have been for personal attacks on another editor. Please follow the rules for wikipedia, or step away until you've calmed down enough to be able to do so. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To put it more bluntly, your personal attacks such as this and this are not acceptable. Stop it or be blocked. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 16:43, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re [1]: Please use the talk page for talk. That's what it's for. I'm not threatening you, I'm warning you (if you insist, "in my capacity as a Wikipedia administrator"). Comments like this are unacceptable on Wikipedia. I don't care about your history with William, or the phase of the moon, or whatever - if you want to invite him to a meeting with pistols in the morning, that is your personal issue. But here on Wikipedia comments like yours are unacceptable under WP:CIVIL, one of Wikipedia's core policies. I'll warn or block any user I see who persists in such comments, although I have to say that I rarely have seen such incoherent aggression before. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 16:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

Since I'm "probably not the best person", I've asked for neutral administrator input at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#.22I.27m_probably_not_the_best_person_to_be_moderating_Wikipedia.22_.5B78.5D. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 20:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Vsmith (talk) 01:12, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Raylopez99! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Max Fogiel - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
John F.W. Rogers - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:30, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Greece

Για το απρεπές σχόλιο σου, δεν έχω πολλά να πω. Μάλλον δεν κοίταξες καν τις references, για να δεις αν έχω χρησιμοποιήσει ξένες πηγές ή όχι. Κρίμα ...--Yannismarou (talk) 16:46, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See also the section I opened here concerning your edit. Your comments are needed. Thanks in advance!--Yannismarou (talk) 17:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Max Fogiel

The article Max Fogiel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for 18 months, orphaned, bare claim of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Will Beback talk 03:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kinnosuke Ogura

A couple of points. Firstly, since you "picked up just the facts on Ogura from a book on mathematicians", please add that as a reference, otherwise the article is unsourced. Secondly, it is not a good idea to give your own articles Feedback, as you did here. Deltahedron (talk) 07:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]