This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bahá'í Faith, a coordinated attempt to increase the quality and quantity of information about the Baháʼí Faith on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.Bahá'í FaithWikipedia:WikiProject Bahá'í FaithTemplate:WikiProject Bahá'í FaithBahá'í Faith
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
It states in this article that there exists a "contradiction" between Luke and Matthew with where Joseph and Mary went to after the birth of Jesus. Contradiction means that two pieces of information cannot both be true. If one is true, the other must be false. Mary and Joseph going to Egypt and going to Nazareth do not logically contradict, for both could be true. I suggest using a more accurate word such as "differ" since both stories do indeed differ from one another. 2600:8807:C0C0:E1:F099:B0A2:BFBD:3B3A (talk) 15:42, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Matthew has Jesus and his family fleeing to Egypt to escape persecution, while Luke's narrative contains no element of fear or harm in Jesus' infancy. Matthew's narrative has the events taking place while Herod the Great is still alive (before 4 BC), and Luke's narratuive has them occur about a decade later, during the term of Quirinius in 6 AD. They directly contradict each other. Their genealogies of Jesus also contradict each other, and ran counter to the narrative in the Gospel of John. It is impossible for all accounts in the contradictory Gospels to be true, but then again they are not truthful narratives. They are fictionalized life accounts, and the writers probably invented the details. Dimadick (talk) 09:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize...
I hope the following is not offensive.
...I'd like to ask all scholars to please try NOT to make false statements about Jesus Christ and the written accounts ...
Is there any HARD EVIDENCE of a contradiction between accounts?
Is it possible that a copyist dropped words, or inverted something?
These accounts were written (approx.) 1900 years ago
...in other languages
...Aramaic and Greek and (?)
To me, it seems easy to make a mistake while copying...especially if the copyist has:
-- no computer
-- no electric lights
-- no internet
-- persecutors trying to kill...
English translations are not "perfect" ...
PLEASE ask HEAVEN
to give us the "light" we need
so we can "see" the TRUTH
about J.C.
... His Life and Words
and HIS PRESENT AUTHORITY ...
Where is your HARD evidence for a contradiction involving Quirinius?
Why can't two (2) geneologies trace via different people?
Why can't both reports be true...they were made some 1900 years ago, in another language...we don't have the original reports...we have "copies" made by human hands ... 76.126.99.15 (talk) 12:47, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Life of Christ and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 20 § Life of Christ until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 15:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)