User talk:Sam Spade

RETIRED

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of April 2007.

Current time: Friday, December 20, 2024, 18:10 (UTC)

Leave a message

Mr. Spade,

A list of Muslim scholars of Islamic Studies are interested in cleaning up the Islam pages, little by little. Some of us are professors and specialists and some are graduate students. We would like to pursue it as a group, each member volunteering to work on one article at a time as we can.

Is there some special procedure since many of these pages are under dispute? We have noticed that many of the entries are far from scholarly, let alone nuetral. Can you give us some guidance that I can pass along to the group before we get started?

Thank you,

Laury Silvers Assistant Professor of Religion Skidmore College

== I'm asking the major contributors to Talk:Roy Masters (commentator) to see my request for participation in a research review leading up to a significant rewrite of the article. Please take a moment to see my comments at the top of that talk page. VisitorTalk 17:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Sam Spade/ - archive

Quotes

(archived @ User:Sam Spade/Quotes)

• "Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others."
  • Ambrose Bierce

Art

User:Sam Spade/Art and artists

Footer

A newly-hatched marginated tortoise

Picture of the day Marie Antoinette and Her Children is an oil-on-canvas painting by the French artist Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun, painted in 1787. It shows Marie Antoinette, the consort of King Louis XVI of France, wearing a red velvet gown with a sable lining. Her younger son, the future Louis XVII, sits on her lap, while her daughter Marie-Thérèse leans on her arm. Marie Antoinette's elder son, Louis Joseph, at that time Dauphin of France, is near an empty cradle intended for her younger daughter Sophie, who died before the painting's completion. The work was commissioned by Louis XVI in an effort to improve the public perception of Marie Antoinette, after her reputation was tarnished by the Affair of the Diamond Necklace, by focusing on her role as a queen and a mother; she is depicted with little jewellery. The painting was first shown at the Salon in Paris, to mixed reactions, and is now displayed at the Palace of Versailles.Painting credit: Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun To include this picture of the day on a page, add the text {{pic of the day}}.

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sam Spade

This arbitration case is closed and the final decision is published at the link above.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 21:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestions

Yes I'm new here. Usually I learn just enough to do what is needed, and since the chlamydial definitions needed updating, here I am. I may be back with questions at some point.

Some of the definitions I'm adding are rather abbreviated. I will encourage some of my colleagues to expand on these entries.

Karin Everett PhD

Thanks

Thanks,

It was good to add a word (intracultural), I am working towards my PhD so hope I can add a short article in the future,

best regards, Bruce Hubbard 03:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Help

Sam, can you help me. See what is happening in Ayyavazhi related article. See the talk page of Ayyavazhi Vaikundar etc.. - Vaikunda Raja 22:17, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

It looks like someone is posting anti-ayyavazhai information in the article. This might be ok, if they did it neutrally, but they did not. Be very careful not to have a fight, even if they are rude. Wikipedia has a very bad system for problems like this. The answer is to always be polite and respectful, and bring lots of friends to help.

I no longer edit articles, but am always willing to give advice to friends. You may want to use email, it might be easier to find me there. Sam Spade 00:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

I need an advocate and help with mediation

Greetings,

I need an advocate who will walk me through the mediation process.

I am trying to get the following added to the Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Max Tegark is a renown physicist and a PhD profressor of cosmology at MIT. He agrees with my addition.

I am having problem with an editor by the name of Lethe who follows me around Wikipedia reverting all my edits without commentary.

I have tried reasoning with him on discussion pages, but he refuses to read what I write.

Advantages of MWI

If Hugh Everett's theory was just another interpretation of Quantum Mechanics it would have no followers, especially since it proposes the existence of countless other universes which theoretically can never be observed. Because it is not falsifiable it seemingly violates Popper's criteria for a good scientific theory. The reason it has so many adherents is because it offers numerous advantages over the Copenhagen Interpretation, among which are the following:

1. Quantum mechanics becomes a deterministic theory making it more compatible with the theory of relativity and all other physics theory to date which are all deterministic. The Copenhagen Interpretation introduced indeterminacy and randomness into science. Aside from the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics there is no scientific theory that includes indeterminacy or randomness. Einstein particularly objected to this aspect of the Copenhagen Interpretation. In response to it, he said, "God does not play dice with the universe."

2. It eliminates the "measurement problem."

3. It eliminates Von Neumann's "boundary problem": where to draw the line between the micro world where quantum mechanics applies, and the macro world where it does not. Shortly before his death in 1953, Albert Einstein wrote: "Like the moon has a definite position whether or not we look at the moon, the same must also hold for the atomic objects, as there is no sharp distinction possible between these and macroscopic objects."

4. It eliminates the special place for an observer and human consciousness.

5. It restores objective reality of the universe between measurements. Shortly before his death, Albert Einstein also wrote: "Observation cannot CREATE an element of reality like a position, there must be something contained in the complete description of physical reality which corresponds to the possibility of observing a position, already before the observation has been actually made."

6. The wave-particle duality paradox evaporates. It simply and naturally explains the double-slit experiment. Richard Feynman said, "[the double-slit experiment] has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality it contains the only mystery." David Deutcsh wrote: ". . . the argument for the many worlds was won with the double-slit experiment."

7. Schrodinger's Cat paradox evaporates.

It seems Einstein's main objections with quantum mechanics had more to do with the Copenhagen Interpretation, than with quantum mechanics itself. While MWI does not quite generate the kinds of worlds necessary to justify the anthropic principle, it is a step on the way to Stephen Hawking's No Boundary Proposal and Max Tegmark's All Universe Hypothesis which do justify the anthropic principle.

Michael D. Wolok 18:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, but I am a bad choice. I suggest you simply avoid conflict, as the wiki-court process is broken and biased. It is very unlikely to be arewarding experience to engage in. 19:30, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

RfC about Irpen's conduct

Hi! We filled a request for comment concerning the conduct of User:Irpen. Your comment is kindly invited.--AndriyK 17:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Proposal on Notability

Because you're a member of the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians, I'm notifying you that the inclusionist proposa Wikipedia:Non-notabilityl is in progress to define the role of notability in articles. Please help us make this successful! Also note the proposal Wikipedia:Importance is a deletionist proposla that seeks to officially introduce notabiltiy for the first time. Make sure this is defeated! --Ephilei 22:36, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

This was pointed out to me

[1] -clearly you were the only one with insight. Zeq 16:06, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, but people like him run this place, dontcha know. Sam Spade 18:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Requesting your assistance

This editor has a problem accepting complaints and criticism on his talk page; he thinks he owns his talk page and has the right to delete them. He is a notorious POV-pusher throughout all articles he is fixated with. Common "hot buttons" are words like "Right" and "Conservative", but may entail a slew of tangential disputes. See [2] and User talk:Lord Loxley#Histrionic? for my attempt to warn him about having a "mission" on the Wikipedia, because I have noticed off and on, just how obsessed his article editing has been with being a vigilante for the Left and trying to portray the Right as wrong. I'll bet all that I have that most of the edits by him are politicised; I believe he should see this here: [3]. Lord Loxley 14:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm no longer active, mainly because of systemic bias on the part of wikipedia's movers and shakers. My advice is to avoid conflict and focus on improving obscure pages and making solid, reliable friends. Sam Spade 18:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

of interest

Thought you mind find this MfD of interest. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 22:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Homage to Catalonia.

I'm afraid I have to pick up sticks and leave. Check my userpage for more info, but thank you for being a fairly rational admin. Kade 18:19, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Funny thing is I'm neither an admin nor an active wikipedian myself... No wonder this place is such a mess! Anyone with any sense departs as soon as they experience "the cabal". Sam Spade 15:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Kim Jong-Il

answers.com is a handy source, and has him down as a dictatorial leader. Myself, I'd call him the worlds ugliest elvis impersonating munchkin, but thats just me.... Sam Spade 15:00, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

— 28 October 2005, Kim Jong-il talk page

You're funny! Thanks for the laugh, I really enjoyed it! See you around. Aaрон Кинни (t) 00:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Possibly, but not here, I no longer edit. Good luck, Sam Spade 15:21, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

AMA Roll Call

There is currently an AMA Roll Call going on. Please visit the page and sign next to your name to indicate whether or not you're still active. :-) אמר Steve Caruso _(desk/poll) 18:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

I am no longer active, partly due to the lack of advocacy. Good luck. Sam Spade 15:21, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

If anyone needs to know anything they can ask. Sam Spade 10:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

If you no longer edit...

Why don't you indicate so on your user page and/or your talk page so that everyone can see? 00:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Your AMA statement was deleted

Your AMA statement was deleted apparently carelessly from the AMA statements page (see this edit)if your statement needs to be restored, the text is at User:Pedant/AMA error Pedant 01:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you very much for your help and orientation. I understand clearly now why my article was subject to speedy deletion. I'll try to write it better later on!

Zettai_mu

SAM HELPME!!!!!!

This person keeps going on over a dispute of which I already tried to settle but he continues on and on and on and on and....well you get the point. Please help. --Qho 16:11, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

This was my apology to him.....

HEY

I AM SORRY BUT I DID NOT MEAN WHAT ALL I SAID.

CAN I HAVE YOUR VIRTUAL HAND SHAKE?

AND IF YOU FEEL LIKE IT PLEASE ADD YOUR ACCOUNT TO MY FRIEND LIST.

--Qho 23:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

And this was his response...

I still don't understand what the problem was. Of course you don't expect me to just say "oh, it's nothing" after making such obvious threats by suggesting you supposedly know my identity. The only resolution i can accept at this moment for this vehement attacks is a face to face meeting to iron out this problem (that should not be a problem for you as you seem very eager to that). however, current circumstances render this meeting very unlikely to occur in the near future and even it will, i'm afraid you won't survive it. And also i would like to know if you would be that brave if i'd be standing next to you as you type, pluck your teeth and use them to enhance your keyboard. -- 89.32.1.82 11:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

ALong with many other comments

Please respond on my talk page.

I think your going to want to ask someone else for help, I am no longer an active user. Sam Spade 11:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Everclear.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Everclear.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. howch e ng {chat} 17:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome!

I didn't get a chance to thank for the welcome message you left me; I didn't login much in the last few years and I didn't notice your message :) Bogdan Butnaru 13:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Rogue administrators

Sam, it's too bad you are not editing anymore. Another editor, Vaikunda Raja, who wrote such nice articles on ayyavazhi quit too. He said: "I've stopped editing on english wikipedia a month back. Some problems there for me. One by one a bunch of editors find fault with me. They don't like cross referencing Ayyavazhi to other articles.Generally I show interest in Ayyavazhi related works. They don't like that. May be mistakes on my side. But in many articles we discussed and solved. But once they warned that they will take administrative actions against me. Was I am a criminal to have administrative actions taken against me? I feel hurt. I remember User Sam Spade saying again and again, "in midst of any problem don't break friendship". I quit simply.

Any way I really thank you and Sam for a long term help in wikipedia. Though my wiki experience is some what worried me in the end I will not forget you two, friends. Thank you very much beyond words."

Too bad.

Raj2004 01:19, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

That is how things are going here, because the people at the top have no social sense, no understanding of training or management. People had problems with Vaikunda Raja because he donated lots of time and effort. They didn't like him putting in all that hard work, and instead of helping him, they prefered to erase what he had done (many, many times). It was not a matter of him being rude, or inventing false stories. He simply had imperfect english. Instead of putting in a bit of work to make minor changes to his articles, they prefered to delete them, and the links tothem, so that they won't be of good to anyone. That is exactly the sort of ignorant short sidedness that disgusted me with the administrators here. If you are not in their circle of friends, you have no power here, no matter how hard you work or how much you do (and Vaikunda Raja did ALOT of good work).

The wikipedia might be a source of information worth reading sometimes, but it does not seem to be a place worth investing time or money in. These petty tyrants and the system which enables and supports them (instead of common users) see's to that.

It is sad really, because the obscure articles such as Vaikunda wrote are what makes the wikipedia worth reading. They seem to be killing themselves slowly, driving off generous and friendly people like Vaikunda, and encouraging those (like User:Mel Etitis) who bully them.

I consider you both friends, and am glad to hear from you any time. I simply refuse to spend time and effort benefiting such a disreputable project as this one.

p.s. please send an email sometime.

Sam Spade 13:26, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Sam, thanks for your reply. Sad but true. It's too bad that excellent contributors like you and Vaikunda Raja had to quit. we all have differences of opinion but just because it's not your point of view, we, like you and I, respect other's opinions so long as it is verifiable. Likewise, I consider you and Raja my friends. Please feel free to e-mail me at rajunyc2003-sivah@yahoo.com

Thanks, Raj2004 00:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

I may end up regretting this....

A comment you made a couple years back is being discussed on Talk:Anarchism under the title "Failed Featured Article". I would appreciate if you could maybe check it out and explain what your objection was at the time more fully, and perhaps say what you think is wrong or right with the article now. Thanks. Ungovernable Force ^{The Wiki Kitchen!} 04:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I am no longer an editor here. Sam Spade 13:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Suggestion

I suggest that you leave a message on either your user page and/or your user talk page to indicate that you're no longer active. 03:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I suggest that you not be no longer active - I've always said you're a good editor, and your presence is a plus for the project. Or, if you've had it with the 'pedia, we could always use a hand on Wiktionary or Wikiquote, where the controversies are much less... controversial. Cheers! bd2412 T 09:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Anyone who needs to know can pay attention to me and find out, I'm not hard to get ahold of or talk to. As far as volunteerism, I'm doing other things now because I don't like the way things are run here. I am considering working on Larry Sanger's new wiki-project tho, and I encourage others who care about encyclopedias or research to find other places to do it. The wikipedia is rotten to its core, with things steadilly declining in regards to training and affirmation of constructive contributors. Forks and other alternate projects are the way to salvage what is good, and leave the mess. Sam Spade 11:38, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Vote

I voted for: alex756 (Alex T. Roshuk, Esq.), Arno Lagrange, Cimon Avaro (Jussi-Ville Heiskanen), Evrik (Bruce Andersen), Improv (Pat Gunn), Kim Bruning, Linuxbeak (Alex Schenck), Oscar (Oscar van Dillen), Ross.Hedvicek (Ross Hedvicek), Zuirdj (Juan David Ruiz)

Some of those people I doubt would make good representatives. Others I don't know who they are. The important thing is that people like Kelly Martin are removed from positions of power. The wikipedia has alot of potential, but it needs a serious trimming if it is to remain relevant. Sam Spade 22:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Spiritual Fauna

This is to advise you that the project page you created above is being considered for deletion. Please follow the links for the details. Thank you. Badbilltucker 23:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

It should probably be deleted, being that it genereated no interest and I am no longer editing. Of course it would be nice if someone wanted to revive it, but that seems unlikely. Sam Spade 08:17, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Advice on conflict resolution

• Mr. Spade,

My apologies for disturbing you, however I was wondering if you could give me some advice regarding a dispute over an image of mobster James "Buddy" McLean I recently uploaded in September. An anonymous user has recently claimed this image, which I had photographed and uploaded from T.J. English's 2005 book Paddy Whacked: The Untold Story of the Irish-American Gangster, belongs to the website http://whiteyworld.com. While I concede the two photographs are similar, I believe this user is mistaken that they are in fact the same photos.

The image in question, as stated in the book, is a photograph belonging to the Boston Police Department (which as far as I am aware falls into public domain) and is used under Wikipedia's fair use policies as "a historically significant photo of a famous individual" and "used only for informational purposes". My view is, as far as I can tell, the photo was taken indoors as I note ceiling tiles and a doorway to the far right in the background. However, the user continues to insist the whiteysworld photo is taken outdoors (noting the trees and street corner) and the present one are from the same photo and has claimed to be a copyright violation. I'm not sure exactly what I should do at this point. While I feel the user is well within his or her rights, I would rather avoid an argument as this conversation seems to be sliding in that direction. MadMax 20:23, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

You are quite right to want to avoid an argument, they rarely end up improving matters. The best thing to do in situations like this is to retreat once it becomes clear you cannot achieve amiable resolution. The more heated things become the less pleasent your editing experience here will be, and the more likely wikipedia policy processes are to become involved. Trust me, you want nothing to do with the conflict resolution processes here, they are especially bad. Much like in the court system of many nations, the process itself is often the punishment. I strongly suggest that you find something more enjoyable to do than argue with this unknown person about that image. Worst case scenario the wikipedia looses out on a single photograph. If you keep arguing w this person however, you may end up wasting valuable hours, hours you can never get back ;)

I'd be willing to step in and help you directly, but I am no longer editing. Sorry about that,

Sam Spade 07:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

• I'm sorry to hear about that Mr. Spade. I'm certainly grateful for the advice however. Thanks again. MadMax 01:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Article breaking apart

Hi Mr. Spade,

I noticed on the Association of Mergist Wikipedians page that you're a mergist and an inclusionist. I have been writing an article about the letter t, but editors have begun to break it up into nonsensical entries, like Abbreviations and symbols of T. So, I was wondering if you could do me a huge favor and possibly give your opinion here? If you could, I would be greatly in your debt.

Best wishes,

Macaw 54 06:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm no longer editing and am uncertain what opinion I might have about the T article if I was... Good luck, my advice is to find another page to edit, wiki-debates tend not to be productive, due to mismanagement from admins/the cabal. Sam Spade 14:41, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Raja Yoga controversy

Dear Hinduism Project editors,

There is a controversy on the Hinduism regarding Raja Yoga. Please read the debate on the Hinduism discussion page. Your comments are requested on the Hinduism discussion page to help resolve the controversy. Thank you. HeBhagawan 14:52, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Danish "Vide"

I am the author of the word "videography" http://videographyblog.com

As such I have spent much of the past 35 years studying the archaic use of the root vid and it's Greek & Latin derivatives. At a recent conference on Language & Genes at the University of California Santa Barbara, I came across a new book by University of Cambridge entitled "Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages". In the book there was a chart showing that of all the European language trees the Danish was the only one that did not make "vide" archaic.

Could you please advise me as to the meaning and roots of "vide" in Danish.

Thank you,

Bob Kiger Oceanside, CA, USA

Sad you're gone

Hey, Sam Spade. I always liked Dashiell Hammett and you seemed to carry some of the charme that I associated with his stories. You were the one who welcomed me to Wikipedia and sometimes I checked your page to see what you were doing. I saw you were doing a lot of editing, you were involved in harsh disputes and in a lot of mediations, and were always helping others. I am a bit sad that you're gone. Maybe, if you find some other thing which is worthwhile, you could post it on your user page. --Ben ^T/_C 21:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Likewise, SqueakBox 20:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I wonder if you'll even see this.

I didn't even notice you had jumped ship before I officially mentioned my own departure. I'm not sure if you'll read this, but I always liked our yammering on my user page (even if it was somewhat brief). If there's any way I can contact you I'd love to consider you a casual acquaintance, my own AIM is Kade Shaderow if you'd rather take the initiative to contact me. Kade 23:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Please, I need help

Someone is trying to delete an article I wrote, can someone please tell what I can do so it doesn't get deleted? I don't know if this is the place to post this question or not, but the person doing this to me seems like the are just hell bent on getting articles deleted. I really appreciate any help.

The article in question is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyler_Pierce

My talk page is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JimmySmitts

Thanks!!!JimmySmitts 08:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

• This issue has been resolved through the removal of Speedy tags and the addition of clean-up temos. John Reaves 11:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

I need to understand

hi I have some info about sufism but I really feel That i am missing something I saw your coment on the sufism article so I want to ask you for more resourses the subject of my search is sufism but also art if you know anything please letme know thx. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bepo a (talk • contribs) 18:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC).

Many skinheads, or some skinheads

Editors of the article Anti-Fascist Action are now arguing about whether the British AFA had many skinheads amongst their numbers, or simply some skinheads amongst their numbers. I added a citation needed-tag and went to look up who the statement in the first place. It turned out to be you. Do you know where you got it from? Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 11:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

block?

{{unblock|no known reason for block}}

You are not blocked. What message are you getting? - crz crztalk 23:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Your account or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Essjay for the following reason (see our blocking policy): This IP address has been blocked temporarily.CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address is being used abusively;the address has been blocked to prevent further abuse.If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please post {{unblock}} on your talk page, with a notereferencing this message. Please be sure to include the IP address (which should appear at the bottom of the block message).Administrators: Please consult with the checkuser who placed the block before unblocking.

Your IP address is 84.166.40.18.

Sam Spade 23:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Looks like you've been unblocked a minute ago by another. - crz crztalk 00:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

thank you. any clue what happened? Sam Spade 00:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Not in the least, actually. - crz crztalk 00:07, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

ah, well I'm blocked again. any guesses why I'm not an active editor? ;)

Sam Spade 00:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Same message? - crz crztalk 00:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, Sam. I've reblocked you. I saw your message, and saw that according to your block log, you were not blocked. I then saw the end of your message, where you gave the IP. The IP had a clean block log, and I assumed that this block was therefore an autoblock resulting from the block of a logged-on user. I undid it. I then saw that it was a checkuser block placed by Essjay. I don't feel I have the right to undo a checkuser block, so I have, with reluctance, reblocked. I'm sorry about that, because it's probably more frustrating for you than if I hadn't blocked in the first place. I should have looked more carefully at the notice on your page. Also, I wasn't sure how long Essjay's block was for, so I blocked the IP for 48 hours. I'll post a message to Essjay immediately, asking him to consider unblocking because of collateral damage, but since it is a checkuser block, I'd rather the decision came from him. Sorry again. AnnH ♫ 00:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Don't feel bad. The wikipedia system is extraordinarilly disempowering for lay users, as this makes clear. Thanks for any and all assistance. Have a good night/day. Sam Spade 00:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Should be good now. - crz crztalk 04:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

thanks. Sam Spade 13:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

The Irony of It All

Isn't it ironic that an article on Political Correctness is being debated because it may offend readers?

where did anne frank hide.

China Jewish immigration policy; .org.

"a little known fact is that China had an open door policy for fleeing Jews." - You on the Swastika Talk page. Can you provide a reference to that? (Sure, it's just a talk page; I'm just curious) --Elvey 04:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Did you try google? Here is a wikipedia reference ;)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_China#World_War_II

considering its not in regards to an article I should think it would be good enough?

Sam Spade 18:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Are you affiliated with samspade.org? (FAQ?)--Elvey 04:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Not at all. Sam Spade 18:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice RE: Compton Pirus.

I'll read up on those links you gave me, and actually I'll admit that I was hurried and tired last night when I deleted that article. In retrospect I realize that my action was not productive towards free speach or a fair rebuttal to my disatisfaction with the article. I'm not a savvy techy, and although I have learned a lot about the editing and contibution tecniques in Wikipedia, I still have lots to learn. The article needs clarification or removal, but deleting the whole thing was not the way to do it. Thanks again, and have a great day. -Chas. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thunderlippps (talk • contribs) 03:16, 30 January 2007 (UTC).

AfD Islamic socialism

You have edited the article Islamic socialism. This article is currently being considered for deletion under the wp:afd process. You may contribute to this discussion by commenting here. Thank you. Edivorce 01:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

User:RepublicUK

Could you please look at User:RepublicUK, I have suspicion they are acting in bad faith. Their username shows an obvious bias, and the comments they have made on their user-page suggest to me that they wouldn't have to make those assertions if they were true! It sounds like they are merely excusing PoV editing. --Couter-revolutionary 12:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Anti-globalization movement and the Middle East

I've nominated the redir you created for deletion, here. -- Kendrick7^talk 19:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Anti-globalization and Anti-Zionism

I've nominated a redir you created for deletion [[Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2007_February_23#Anti-globalization_and_Anti-Zionism_→_Anti-globalization_and_antisemitism]|here]]. -- Kendrick7^talk 19:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

about the yeti

about the yeti i was wondering the caption says it can exceed 200 mph in a dive is that true? cause if it can then they need to compete it against the peregrine falcon cause it is currently considered the fastest animal on earth....just curious

Historical Accuracy

In finally reading my cousins account of my grandmonthers travels during this time period, I must beg of you all not to take this all to literally. Many of the accounts are taken second hand from family that was not present during any of the events. The actual children of the Florence "Owens" Thompson preferred not to join in the writing of the book, but did wish Roger well in his venture. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.225.5.32 (talk) 02:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC).

Image:Brainwashing.jpg

Hello, Sam Spade. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Brainwashing.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Sam Spade/ - archive/November 2005. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot) -talk 07:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Brainwashing.jpg

Hello, Sam Spade. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Brainwashing.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Sam Spade/ - archive/Januar 2006. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot) -talk 07:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Brainwashing.jpg

Hello Sam Spade, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Brainwashing.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Sam Spade/ - archive/Dezember 2005. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot) -talk 10:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Brainwashing.jpg

Hello Sam Spade, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Brainwashing.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Sam Spade/ - archive/Februar 2006. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot) -talk 10:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Clutch - Pure rock fury.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Clutch - Pure rock fury.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Nubie biting

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nubie biting, by Blake3522 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nubie biting fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Cross namespace redirect, self-reference

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nubie biting, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Nubie biting itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:19, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Welcoming Commitee deletion

I have nominated the Redirect Wikipedia:Welcoming Commitee for deletion. You are welcome to join in the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. Marlith 23:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

RfD nomination of No original research

I have nominated Category:No original research (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Mel sa ran (formerly Salaskаn) 22:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

recent edit

Sam, hello,

Regarding your editing my August 1st post on Garrison Keillor, you listed my post as criticism. Prior to posting, I reviewed the Wikipedia police on neutrality and the entire page for Keillor. My post, turned out to be the best example of posting neutrality for his entire page; no accusation is made, without verifiable proof, illustrated by my posting the District Court's case numbers and a link to the Court's web site; all courts mandate neutrality, in allegation form, in pleadings submitted by all parties; accordingly, instead of my posting:

"That G***D*** GARRISON KEILLOR IS A F****** FED AND HE SHAFTED ME!!!!

I posted only an verifiable accusation. Please access my web presence at:

http://Groups.Msn.Com/ClaytonStateStudents

There, you will find Georgia U.S. Senator Max Cleland's letter to me, regarding his opening a Congressional Inquiry (into my employment with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and as my handler). My Petitions, Actions, and Pleadings before The United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division:

1:07-CV-1008-CAM; 1:07-CV-1009-CAM; 1:07-CV-0335-CAM-JFK; 1:07-CV-0318-CAM-JFK; can be accessed at:

http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/

All this was posted within my post to Keillor’s Wiki page.

I look forward to hearing from you and please feel free to contact in advence with any thoughts.

Sincerely,

Paul Douglas Hale 2006 Independent Candidate Georgia Governor

A82273 at Hotmail

HALE v. COBB COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER

HALE v. HEAD, Et. Al.

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SUBMITTED SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

STATE OF GEORGIA V. TROY ANTHONY DAVIS

BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE

BY: PAUL DOUGLAS MASON HALE'

your shirt

Where did you get that shirt? It's awesome!

your shirt

Where did you get that shirt? It's great! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.139.163.2 (talk) 20:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Dear Sam Spade / Julius Sahara,

This is Steve Le Feuvre (the is my real name, no need to use any other), and I notice that you are continually changing my entries for The Prince of Wales School to Nairobi School and putting re-directs in place on the pretext that it's not a good idea to have duplicate information.

I fully appreciate the fact that the name of the Prince of Wales School changed in 1965 to Nairobi School, and indeed I was at the school when it was using the new name. However, many many former pupils knew the school as the Prince of Wales School and were very proud to be associated with it. I am the Webmaster of the Old Cambrian Society which is for former pupils and staff of the school, so I know the feelings run very high. Also, there is strong feeling coming from recently graduated students and current students to be linked with the past and the old name.

Therefore, could you please let this one lie and allow the two articles on the school to co-exist under the two separate names? It means so much to my members (both young and old, past and current) to see the name as it was, as well as the new name article. I plan in the next month of so to extend the article(s) about the school to give a lot more history from the early days right through to the present, and I do not wish to have the articles affected in any way. You will see that just yesterday I posted some photos of the magnificent school buildings. Again, I plan to publish more photos in due course.

Just as an aside, precendents for keeping old names on the Wikipedia system for historical purposes are numerous: e.g. Tanganyika, British East Africa, German East Africa, British Somaliland, Burma, Rhodesia, Persia, Guadalcanal, etc.

Regards

Steve Le Feuvre

hey sam

just reviewing some of my own beliefs regarding the shepherd's chapel brought me to your page. wanted to say hello and that I respect your opinions. wikipedia is an amazing resource - I use it several times throughout the week - and those of the community who want to pump the well, regardless of their religious/political/sociological bent are, in my eyes, great people.

take care. I also like pulp crime from the red harvest days forward so cheers on the handle as well.

sean stranded@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.200.42.201 (talk) 08:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Klemig - life unworthy of life.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Klemig - life unworthy of life.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Klemig - life unworthy of life.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ensiferum Iron.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ensiferum Iron.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Matt Furey

Why have all references to Matt Furey been removed? It seems a bit suspect that he could cause such censorship. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.208.134.100 (talk) 23:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Anti-globalization and antisemitism

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Anti-globalization and antisemitism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Anti-globalization and antisemitism

I have nominated Anti-globalization and antisemitism, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-globalization and antisemitism (3rd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternative education

There has been a proposal brought forward [4] regarding a merger of WikiProject Alternative Education, and as you are member of that project, I am notifying you. Thanks. Twenty Years 13:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Buju Banton Inna Heights.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Buju Banton Inna Heights.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Homeschooling May 2008 Newsletter

	The Homeschooling WikiProject News
Issue Four • May 2008 • About the Newsletter
News Recent Project News Collaboration of the Month nominations are currently open for WikiProject Homeschooling's Collaboration of the month. So far there have been two nominations. You can nominate and vote at May's Collaboration page (link). Project member count reaches 37 members! Invite others using our invitation templates. A new article, List of homeschooled individuals has been created. You can help the project by tagging the talk pages of articles with {{WikiProject Homeschooling}} We are working on getting the homeschooling article to GA status.
Archives • Newsroom
Newsletter written by DiligentTerrier (and friends). Newsletter delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot

The message above has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot, a bot operated by Diligent Terrier.

hh

hi what they did in 1992 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.23.171.121 (talk) 02:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Homeschooling newsletter for June 2008

	The Homeschooling WikiProject News
Issue Five • June 2008 • About the Newsletter
News Recent Project News User:Diligent Terrier has retired. Project member count reaches 37 members! Invite others using our invitation templates. You can help the project by tagging the talk pages of articles with {{WikiProject Homeschooling}} We are working on getting the homeschooling article to GA status.
Archives • Newsroom
Newsletter written by User:RC-0722. Newsletter delivered by User:RC-0722

Speedy deletion of National-Anarchism

A tag has been placed on National-Anarchism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Lenerd (talk) 03:29, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Vishnuism

I have nominated Vishnuism, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishnuism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Wikidās ॐ 12:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Template:Most active regional blocs

Hello, This super-handy template which you created under your User:Alinor account includes the acronym PARTA for PAcific Regional Trade Agreement; the term is wiki-linked to the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF). I have diligently looked for, but cannot find, confirmation of the relationship between PARTA and PIF.

The PIF countries appear to be the PICTA countries plus Australia and New Zealand. Is it appropriate to update the template to PIF in place of PARTA? Thank you! Newportm (talk) 19:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Wikipolicy

I have nominated Wikipolicy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 12:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Factual Accuracy

I have nominated Factual Accuracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 01:12, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Little context in Leftist anti-Semitism

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Leftist anti-Semitism, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Leftist anti-Semitism is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Leftist anti-Semitism, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Bias

Hi Sam I wanted to talk with you about something a spotted on a page that is bias. WB as soon as you can.

Thanks

Conductcode (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of List of Missing Wikipedians

I have nominated List of Missing Wikipedians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 08:09, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Classical pantheism

I have nominated Classical pantheism, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classical pantheism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thou Art That (band)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Thou Art That (band), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:49, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

A Dtoider. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.98.152.20 (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Adolf Hitler's health

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Adolf Hitler's health. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolf Hitler's health. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Homeschooling Roll Call

Hello, Sam Spade! You are receiving this message because you are on WikiProject Homeschooling's list of members. WikiProject Homeschooling is holding a roll call to identify active members. All members will be listed under "Pending". Please move your name to "Active" or "Inactive" based on your ability or interest in contributing to the project. After two weeks all names still listed under "Pending" will be moved to "Inactive". If you are actively interested in participating, we are in the process of trying to revive the project and would welcome any help. Discussion can be found at the project talk page. Cheers! 21:00, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cultural group

The article Cultural group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is, at best, a definition, more suited to Wiktionary, contains no references, and is extremely vague. Unless there is evidence that this is a robust concept in sociology or some other discipline that can be backed up by multiple, reliable, high quality sources, this should be deleted.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Interdenominationalism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interdenominationalism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interdenominationalism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:45, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

ganan kiamat

wamta nawantiah knista babakanya awamnya kuan eawam You are not currently logged in. If you save any edits, your IP address will be recorded publicly in this page's edit history. If you create an account, you can conceal your IP address and be provided with many other benefits. Messages sent to your IP can be viewed on your talk page.

Please do not save test edits. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you need any help getting started with editing, see the New contributors' help page. Dan quran 20-40-9= — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.246.113.38 (talk) 05:29, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ensiferum Iron.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Ensiferum Iron.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

User talk:Diablorex/ARCHIVE listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect User talk:Diablorex/ARCHIVE. Since you had some involvement with the User talk:Diablorex/ARCHIVE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Rejection of God listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rejection of God. Since you had some involvement with the Rejection of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 22:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wotansvolk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wotansvolk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dave Dial (talk) 22:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Avoid personal remarks, listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Avoid personal remarks,. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Avoid personal remarks, redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 12:30, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Cease their homosexuality listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cease their homosexuality. Since you had some involvement with the Cease their homosexuality redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Cherenobl listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cherenobl. Since you had some involvement with the Cherenobl redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Will Robinson

The article Will Robinson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Domdeparis (talk) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft: Sally Swanson

Hello - I noticed you deleted the draft page for Sally Swanson. Can you let me know why it was deleted and whether it is possible to reverse this? I would like to make edits in response to suggestions from other Wiki contributors, in hopes of getting the page closer to being approved. Please let me know. Thank you very much. Nuuknee (talk) 00:38, 7 July 2017 (UTC) Nuuknee

Warping spacetime listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Warping spacetime. Since you had some involvement with the Warping spacetime redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 17:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Mythical being listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mythical being. Since you had some involvement with the Mythical being redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Political groups listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Political groups. Since you had some involvement with the Political groups redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 05:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Orthodox jew listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orthodox jew. Since you had some involvement with the Orthodox jew redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Bus stop (talk) 22:08, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Social libertarian listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Social libertarian. Since you had some involvement with the Social libertarian redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Smartyllama (talk) 17:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Premises for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Premises is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premises (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 21:45, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

"Anti-globalism" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anti-globalism. Since you had some involvement with the Anti-globalism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:33, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Hinduism

WikiProject Hinduism

Hello, Sam Spade. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. We would like to introduce a newsletter to Wikiproject Hinduism. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!

Subscribe

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Contribute
• Subscribe/Unsubscribe
• Archive

---

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Hinduism. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

"United States Of Amerca" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect United States Of Amerca. Since you had some involvement with the United States Of Amerca redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 17:32, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

"Sockpuppets" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sockpuppets. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 11#Sockpuppets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

"120,000 years ago" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 120,000 years ago. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 9#120,000 years ago until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Interstellarity (talk) 19:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gord the Rogue

The article Gord the Rogue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Only sources are primary interviews more relevant to Gary Gygax than the character, and it appears they're already referenced on his article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 19:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

"Fubbi Quantz" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fubbi Quantz. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 6#Fubbi Quantz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Leschnei (talk) 13:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

"Interdenominational" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Interdenominational. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 9#Interdenominational until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Place Clichy (talk) 07:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

AIPS (international sports press association) Edit

Hey Sam, this is Nadine, i am a Sports journalist, I saw you have created AIPS page and in need for some resources, I found some info that can help, and also I have some content by email too through my AIPS newsletter subscription.

here are the links:

ABOUT AIPS: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IpIRyy83dBNMuX4df7rSN4mgN-JUSLeo/view

AIPS MAIN WEBSITE: https://www.aipsmedia.com/

THE HISTORY OF AIPS: https://www.aipsmedia.com/index.html?page=history

I hope this helps, i tried editing the page but my edits were rejected because of COI (conflict of interests).

cheers,~~ognadz~~

"Ancient Catholic" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ancient Catholic and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#Ancient Catholic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

"Ancient catholic" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ancient catholic and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#Ancient catholic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

"The Ancient Catholic Church" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Ancient Catholic Church and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#The Ancient Catholic Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

"The Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#The Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

"Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#Ancient Catholic Church of the Netherlands until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

"Jewish community" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Jewish community and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 9#Jewish community until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

"Absolute knowledge" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Absolute knowledge has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Absolute knowledge until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 07:03, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

"Workers" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Workers has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 15 § Workers until a consensus is reached. fgnievinski (talk) 17:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)